What
a shock this discovery at Stonehenge has been! When we went there to look for
the carving of a fish, little did we know what we were going to uncover. I had
known for some time that there had been some carvings at Stonehenge, but I thought
hey must have been carved wooden posts. I also got it impressed on my mind that
the ancient name of this place was "Hagaar Attan".
Strange things had happened to me as I was walking on the downs. I had heard harps playing, drums beating, and some sort of bagpipes. Then these "impressions" went through my mind: "In the beginnings, they have got it wrong, it is important". I often thought of the people that had lived long ago in the past. I couldn't help it with all the signs there were all about me.
Then I got it firmly impressed on my mind that I was going to find some carved stones, another Stonehenge. I searched the downs for miles looking for it. It was while I as looking for this other henge monunent that I got the warning: "We are trying to give you another chance, listen to us. Do not be afraid, it is nothing to to do with the supernatural, but a science that you do not understand." Then I got the warning that we were releasing forces into the upper atmosphere that neither we nor they could control, and that our planet would be destroyed and others with it.
It was that which made me feel very worried; I was sure that I had been wandering on the downs too much on my own, and that I was going round the bend. I stopped going out on the downs so much, but the voices persisted, and told me that when the time was right I would find the carving of a fish at Stonehenge.
Well, my health wasn't so good, and I moved house, so I didn't go out on the downs, but I had an urge to get books from the Library on British prehistory. I had also got it impressed on my mind that there was something in South America that would link up with Stonehenge.
Then, one evening last September my daughter had two of her friends in our house, and we got talking about Stonehenge. I told them of some of things that had happened on the downs. A few evenings later, as I was busy in the garden, they arrived again and said that they wanted to go to Stonehenge to see if there really was a fish carving on the stones there. I was bundled into the car and we were on our way before I had a chance to realise what as happening, and that began it all!
We found the symbolic elephant heads first, and then to our amazement we could see that there were other things. There was what seemed to be a bull, and when we photographed it we found there was a man on horseback apparently tackling it. We found my fish, and when we photographed it we found we had a canoe load of fishermen, a bear's head, and a hunter thrown in! A very strange thing about it all was that I began to know what we would find before we found it, and even now I can see things on the stones that my helpers cannot see at all until they are photographed, when they can see them plainly.
Gradually the real Stonehenge began to reveal itself to us. Some of the carvings are quite easy to see with the naked eye, and it really is a mystery to us that trained archaeologists hadn't seen any of them before. Maybe it's true that, as one person said when I showed him round, "They get their little theories and look for facts to fit them, and they don't see anything else." The funny thing is that the axes and daggers that they have made such a fuss about are parts of the pictures.
It is a good job that they had told me not to be afraid, because one night I was standing by the helestone, and suddenly it began to glow - it took on the appearance of a serpent, its eyes lit up, it writhed, and a man came out of its mouth. The body vanished, but the head remained above the nose. I could see big bonfires burning all round the outside of the ditch, and I could smell the wood-smoke. All around me were people, a noble, highly civilised race, not a bit like "Ancient Britons" are supposed to have been. They wore lovely clothes in rich colours, and they were laughing and singing. I could hear singing from the temple, and the sound of drums and harps; it was beautiful.
The temple was a blaze of light, and on every upright I could see carvings in colour. Then it was all gone; it only lasted for a flash of time but everything was impressed on my mind. I knew then the meaning of the serpent and why it was placed at the entrance to the temple. The serpent was a token put there by the Sky People; it was their sign. Later I learned that they like us to know that they "travel the road of the Serpent along the Highways of the Suns".
Some time in the remote past there had been a catastrophe of such gigantic force that only remnants of people on Earth survived, and the Sky People had come down to help put the survivors on their feet. One highly civilised race had escaped from their submerged continent; they arrived in boats along the coasts of Britain and Ireland. Some of the people from the Continent arrived in the Americas.
The serpent was placed at the entrance to the temple as a sign that the Sky People would always help and protect the people who used the temple, which was dedicated to Jo Hedra (Jehovah?), the Ruler of the Universe, at whose bidding the Sky People had come. It is placed with its back to the sunrise as a symbol that the Sky People come from worlds beyond the Sun; the Sunrise touches the serpent and sends light and fertility. In fact that is one of the reasons the serpent was looked upon us a symbol of creation and fertlity in so many places in ancient times, but the true meaning got lost with the passing of the centuries.
I believe that the serpent was a token that there would not be another catastrophe as long as the people lived us the Sky People taught. I don't know how the link with the Sky People come to be broken, but the temple has been desecrated, and there is a great feeling of tragedy about the place.
We have found three carved characters who might represent the Sky People:
1) The people who put this one here had a wonderful sense of humour. He is on the inside of the newly re-erected trilithon, and has a tall helmet with a tassel hanging from the top and a shiny chin-strap. Maybe there is a badge, but I'm not sure. It has a peak. There are epaulets on his shoulders, and he is wearing what appears to be a tunic down to his thighs; he also has tights or light trousers, and a pair of knee-high boots with turnover tops. His bearing is at once that of a drilled soldier, and at ease. Does he represent a Space crewman? He has a mascot in the form of a girl with long hair carved at his side.
2) We found this one at the top of the same upright as the first, only he is on the outside and at the top. He seems to be wearing some kind of helmet with what appear to be two small propellers at the top of it. He has a fur jacket and gloves, a shiny tunic, a belt, and trousers tucked into his boots. There is little doubt that while the first was is "dress" uniform, this is a working outfit, and strongly resembles a flying kit. From his fingers there appears to be something hanging from a cable, and this trails right down to the ground. His bearing is commanding and at the same time "dare-devil"; a leader, I would say.
3) We were "directed" when we took this photo, and we knew we had to take two different pictures from different angles to get what was on thc upright. The figure is on the outer face of the opposite trilithon to the first figure. We were somewhat shaken when we saw the pictures, for on ths first photo we had what appears to be a figure in a strange helmet that comes right down over his face. It looks as if a tube may be coming from it down to his chest. There are holes round the helmet (for vision?) and he appears to be seated on what could be a scooter. He has epaulets on his shoulders, a tunic or jacket, belt, trousers and fur-lined boots. You can see the creases in his trousers and boots very plainly.
The second picture is very startling because, although it is the same carving, the figure is standing upright, and a chieftain is embracing him very warmly. In this picture we could see the "foot" of the scooter very plainly. The figure takes up most of the upright from top to bottom.
There are many carvings at Stonehenge; all the stones, including the bluestones, have them. Who were the men who wore a little pencil-thin moustache, and a variety of headdresses, including cowhorn? Who are the lovely women who are on the stones? Priestesses?
If anyone reading this thinks that there cannot be anything strange at Stonehenge, I would suggest that they get the book by Professor Atkinson (1956) and look at Plate 20b, "The blue-stones on a sledge". If they look at the trilithon nearest the real entrance, they will see that the two uprights have become a group of statues. On the single upright to the left they will see a huge head in three dimensions. I wrote to Professor Atkinson and pointed this out, but received no reply.
When we went to Avebury we got quite a shock. We had banished the fur-clad "Ancient Britons" from Stonehenge, and ,within a few minutes of our arrival at this place we realised they had nothing to do with the stones here either. As we walked among the huge stones we could see sculptured human heads (full size), groups of statues, and animals. We paused by a statue of a "king" sitting on a throne, and we scratched our heads in bewilderment. I felt a creepy sensation going down my neck, for it didn't seem possible that trained archaeologists had missed these wonders.
The stones of Avebury are more of a wonder than those at Stonehenge, for it is evident that the working here was done by a very highly civilised people. These stones must have been put here thousands of years ago, for the carvings are very worn, but they can be traced by the naked eye, and I think the camera will pick up what we can't trace. These carvings are of a people who wore clothes and shoes, and had chairs to sit in. I wonder if they ever saw those legendary folk wearing animal skins wandering about! I suppose they do fit in somewhere, but they certainly didn't build Stonehenge or Avebury.
Tiahuanoco in Bolivia ties up with Stonehenge and Avebury. I was directed to search through books on South American archaeology, and at the same time a three-fingered hand appeared on one of our photos, and one of the bluestones appears to have turned into a beckoning hand. We are not sure whether some of the carvings at Stonehenge have only got three fingers, but while I was wondering about this I spotted that the carvings at Tiahuanoco have three fingers, and I knew I had found what I had had to look for.
There are uprights similar to Stonehenge at Tiahuanoco, and I believe that the two that are on each side of the stairway will have carvings on them like Stonehenge. There is also a horseshoe mound near there, I believe.
I believe the stones at Carnac in Brittany will have carvings on them too, and I know the circle at Keswick in the Lake District has them. I think there must be many of them about, and there seems to be a need for a Society to search out carved prehistoric stones all over the world.
Mollie Carey
The Great Isosceles Triangle of England - a pattern of "primary leys" discovered by Philip Heselton in 1961, and the connection with "orthotenies" (UFO sighting alignments) discovered by Jimmy Goddard in 1966.